Bolivia, NSW

View map

Hello NatureMaprsAs we move into the cooler months and sighting counts begin to wind down our team has been working tirelessly to ensure our platform’s usability and performance. All merch has been po...

Improvements to data import tool (coming soon)

NatureMapr welcomes Edgar McNamara

Platform wide attribute changes

New Feature: Moderator Quick Responses!

Discussion

PJH123 wrote:

2 May 2025

Ian, I believe the bold premedial line and saw toothed post medial lines on my specimen show up well on several examples of Epicyrtica hippolopha but not so on E. docima

Epicyrtica hippolopha

ibaird wrote:

1 May 2025

OK, I agree Epicyrtica (genus) 'fits the lines'' better. but I suggest there are other species in that genus that might fit equally well, if we accept this is a faded specimen. For example:
Epicyrtica docima (already in the NatureMapr taxonomy for SouthCoast region, with no sightings):-
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/a958ac19-22da-4077-a3b5-788aff3b4e32
On that basis I suggest 'Epicyrtica (genus)'

Epicyrtica hippolopha

WendyEM wrote:

1 May 2025

Yes, Epicyrtica hippolopha fits the lines well
https://bie.ala.org.au/species/https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/e2c965e9-b0ad-4a36-86fc-8fba6d44e55b#names
well done you and Wes

Epicyrtica hippolopha

PJH123 wrote:

1 May 2025

Thanks to Wes Jenkinson, I believe it is a worn Epicyrtica hippolopha (Turner, 1936)
https://bold-au.hobern.net/specimens.php?taxid=53639

Epicyrtica hippolopha

donhe wrote:

1 May 2025

I do not think the lines match those of Blenina lichenopa.

Epicyrtica hippolopha